Marxism–Leninism
| Previous chapter ( Zionism ) | Table of contents | Next chapter ( Nazism ) |
Corresponding Wikipedia article: Marxism–Leninism
Karl Marx is the son of a baptized Jew, the grandson of Rabbi Marx Levi. The field of his interest is typically Jewish: law, history, philosophy. He had repeated the Hegel’s German philosophy and the Smith’s English political economy together with his friend F. Engels. Also he created few modern theories for that time.
Theory of surplus value is a description of the capitalist exploitation for the naive people. As though the author does not mean that the real manufacturers in a market are not sure to receive the surplus value and even the revenue, which compensates the production cost. At the same time, the income of real capitalists (moneylenders, rentiers and landlords) requires a minimum effort and risk. A moneylender, who took a lien, risks to lose only the capitalist profit, which he get easily. Also, the author does not mention that if the gold standard would be canceled, the central banks, which issue the paper money, will risk practically nothing.
The Marxist socialism eliminates the profit and so, from a naive point of view, it eliminates the exploitation of a real manufacturer. In fact, it puts him into the complete dependence on the non-productive part of society, which has a minimum responsibility for own decisions and actions. For example, the cost is set arbitrarily (without a haggling) and, therefore, the underestimation of labor and goods is possible, that is the exploitation.
Historical materialism is a Soviet name of the vulgar (simplified) materialistic philosophy. Marx, the grandson of a Rabbi, had secretly described the relationships evolution between the Zionists and the peoples, who were conquered by them. The Zionists, as every Jews, originally had no any land except a land, which was "promised" to them by their tribal god, who also promised to enslave other peoples. The criminal enslavement should be somehow legitimized and stabilized. To do this, the so-called social progress was invented: the gradual destruction of the natural family (or national) relationships. As a result, all the families and nations are going down except the chosen ones.
| Period | Formation | Description | Role of Zionists |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prehistoric | Primitive communities | Society is organized on the tribal (national) principle. | The plain criminal activity is only possible. |
| Babylon and Assyria, Greece and Rome, Khaganate. |
Slavery | The slave is a foreigner, a prisoner or a criminal. The Empire is a slaveholding kingdom. |
Possession and trade of slaves from the peoples, who are conquered by the empire. |
| Medieval Eurasia | Feudalism | The estates (castes) are separating and corrupting the national elites. | Trade. Usury. Religion. Secret societies. |
| Modern | Capitalism | The significance of the national elites and borders is reduced. Democracy. Private property. | Finance. Trade. Mass media. Science and education. |
| Contemporary | Socialism | Elimination of the national elites (the exploiting class). Internationalism. | Social elite. |
| Communism | The complete enslavement of peoples, who are deprived of their nationality and family. Building of a "mound" (see «Kabbalah»). |
Russia always lagged behind the western countries within this social progress. Therefore, Russia came to the attention of the Zionists and other progressive people in the XIX century.
The quotes from Engels’s «Democratic Pan-Slavism» [1]:
«To the sentimental phrases about brotherhood which we are being offered here on behalf of the most counter-revolutionary nations of Europe, we reply that hatred of Russians was and still is the primary revolutionary passion among Germans; that since the revolution hatred of Czechs and Croats has been added, and that only by the most determined use of terror against these Slav peoples can we, jointly with the Poles and Magyars, safeguard the revolution. We know where the enemies of the revolution are concentrated, viz. in Russia and the Slav regions of Austria, and no fine phrases, no allusions to an undefined democratic future for these countries can deter us from treating our enemies as enemies».
«But whereas the French, Germans, Italians, Poles and Magyars raised high the banner of the revolution, the Slavs one and all put themselves under the banner of the counter-revolution. In the forefront were the Southern Slavs, who had already for many years upheld their counter-revolutionary separatist aims against the Magyars; then came the Czechs, and behind them — the Russians, armed for battle and ready to appear on the battlefield at the decisive moment».
«Then there will be a struggle, an inexorable life-and-death struggle, against those Slavs who betray the revolution; an annihilating fight and ruthless terror — not in the interests of Germany, but in the interests of the revolution!».
«Peoples which have never had a history of their own, which from the time when they achieved the first, most elementary stage of civilization already came under foreign sway, or which were forced (!!!) to attain the first stage of civilization only by means of a foreign yoke, are not viable and will never be able to achieve any kind of independence. And that has been the fate of the Austrian Slavs. The Czechs, among whom we would include the Moravians and Slovaks, although they differ in respect of language and history, have never had a history of their own… and this historically absolutely non-existent "nation" puts forward claims to independence?»
Another quotes of Engels:
«Cossacks, Bashkirs and other predatory rabble conquered the republic, the heiress of the French Revolution».
«and as to Russia, she could only be mentioned as the detainer of an immense amount of stolen property, which would have to be disgorged on the day of reckoning»[2].
«It leaves Europe with only one alternative: subjugation by the Slavs, or the permanent destruction of the centre of their offensive force—Russia»[3].
«It cannot be spoken about German interests, German freedom, German unity, German welfare, when the question is about freedom or oppression, about happiness or misery of whole Europe. All national issues end here; there is only one question! Would you like to be free, or want you to be under the thumb of Russia?»[1]
A quote from Marx’s «Revelations of the Diplomatic History of the 18th Century» [4]:
«It is in the terrible and abject school of Mongolian slavery that Muscovy was nursed and grew up. It gathered strength only by becoming a virtuoso in the craft of serfdom. Even when emancipated, Muscovy continued to perform its traditional part of the slave as master. At length Peter the Great coupled the political craft of the Mongol slave with the proud aspiration of the Mongol master, to whom Genghis Khan had, by will, bequeathed his conquest of the earth... If the Muscovite Czars, who worked their encroachments by the agency principally of the Tartar Khans, were obliged to tartarise Muscovy, Peter the Great, who resolved upon working through the agency of the West, was obliged to civilise Russia. … who were to drill Russians into that varnish of civilisation that adapts them to the technical appliances of the Western peoples, without imbuing them with their ideas».
From the Marx’s speech in a Polish meeting [5]:
«I ask you, what has changed? Has the danger from the Russia side been lessoned? No. Rather, the delusion of the ruling classes of Europe has reached its pinnacle ... Her methods, her tactics, her maneuvers may change, but the pole star -- world domination -- is immutable. Only a crafty government, ruling over a mass of barbarians, could devise such a plan nowadays... Thus Europe faces only one alternative: Either Asian barbarism, under the leadership of the Muscovites, will come down on Europe like an avalanche, or Europe must restore Poland and thereby protect itself against Asia with a wall of 20 million heroes, to win time for the consummation of its social transformation".
See also
References
- ↑ F. Engels, The Revolutionary Uprising in the Palatinate and Baden., Volume 6.
| Previous chapter ( Zionism ) | Table of contents | Next chapter ( Nazism ) |
